<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Is So Difficult</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theoptionguru.com/blog/2010/01/this-is-so-difficult/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theoptionguru.com/blog/2010/01/this-is-so-difficult/</link>
	<description>Option Spread Trading for Income</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://theoptionguru.com/blog/2010/01/this-is-so-difficult/comment-page-1/#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoptionguru.com/blog/?p=1340#comment-737</guid>
		<description>Oguru,
Thanks for the advice. This comment ended up in my spam folder due to the number of links. I took your advice and re-directed my page. I visited your blog - I see it&#039;s new - good luck and post frequently.
&lt;em&gt;- Jeff&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oguru,<br />
Thanks for the advice. This comment ended up in my spam folder due to the number of links. I took your advice and re-directed my page. I visited your blog &#8211; I see it&#8217;s new &#8211; good luck and post frequently.<br />
<em>- Jeff</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://theoptionguru.com/blog/2010/01/this-is-so-difficult/comment-page-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoptionguru.com/blog/?p=1340#comment-722</guid>
		<description>Bruce,

I would &lt;strong&gt;like&lt;/strong&gt; to say that you have come to the mountain, but it&#039;s really just a mole hill :)

When I see stock with great earnings (IBM, GS) and then watch them fall, that is telling me something. Three 2% drops on major indexes in a row excites me in a sick way. I was able to get in a couple of Bear Calls early this week, but it this point it&#039;s too late to &#039;chase&#039; the bear move. Unless you can find a stock that is holding up (advance/decliners was 557/2525 today), it&#039;s best to just wait for a bear flag, and when you get confirmation on continuation of the bear trend, jump on it!

I don&#039;t think the &#039;sale prices&#039; are at their peak. On the S&amp;P I have a long-term lower channel at 1080 and FIB 23.6% retracement at 1038. Watch for a bounce at one of these levels. We will see if they hold as support or totally break down. We take escalators up and elevators down.

Good luck.

&lt;em&gt;- Jeff&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce,</p>
<p>I would <strong>like</strong> to say that you have come to the mountain, but it&#8217;s really just a mole hill <img src='http://theoptionguru.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>When I see stock with great earnings (IBM, GS) and then watch them fall, that is telling me something. Three 2% drops on major indexes in a row excites me in a sick way. I was able to get in a couple of Bear Calls early this week, but it this point it&#8217;s too late to &#8216;chase&#8217; the bear move. Unless you can find a stock that is holding up (advance/decliners was 557/2525 today), it&#8217;s best to just wait for a bear flag, and when you get confirmation on continuation of the bear trend, jump on it!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the &#8216;sale prices&#8217; are at their peak. On the S&amp;P I have a long-term lower channel at 1080 and FIB 23.6% retracement at 1038. Watch for a bounce at one of these levels. We will see if they hold as support or totally break down. We take escalators up and elevators down.</p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
<p><em>- Jeff</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://theoptionguru.com/blog/2010/01/this-is-so-difficult/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoptionguru.com/blog/?p=1340#comment-720</guid>
		<description>So if it was  difficult on January 17th then how do you describe the market here on January 22nd?

I was gaining more and more confidence in the past month (always a dangerous sign).  Now a correction (small or large is a matter of perspective).

So as I squint at the headlights in my eyes I need to make some decisions.  Embrace the bear and profit from the trend or buy up my favorites when they are on sale?

I can&#039;t decide and instead have decided to commiserate with The Option Guru.  Any sage advice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if it was  difficult on January 17th then how do you describe the market here on January 22nd?</p>
<p>I was gaining more and more confidence in the past month (always a dangerous sign).  Now a correction (small or large is a matter of perspective).</p>
<p>So as I squint at the headlights in my eyes I need to make some decisions.  Embrace the bear and profit from the trend or buy up my favorites when they are on sale?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t decide and instead have decided to commiserate with The Option Guru.  Any sage advice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oguru</title>
		<link>http://theoptionguru.com/blog/2010/01/this-is-so-difficult/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Oguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoptionguru.com/blog/?p=1340#comment-718</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff,

Just a piece of advice towards your site structure. Its good, Jeff ! I am reading your Trade logs. I noticed that the page http://theoptionguru.com/ has no Index value in Google, But http://theoptionguru.com/blog has PR 2. Why not you modify your http://theoptionguru.com/ to point to http://theoptionguru.com/blogs/ and http://theoptionguru.com/archives (or something like that) point to http://buywrite.wordpress.com ?
This will be good for google to index and earn good PR in the long run. 
Just my two cents ...
By the the way I am writing with the same name &quot;optionguru&quot; in my Indian Options Blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff,</p>
<p>Just a piece of advice towards your site structure. Its good, Jeff ! I am reading your Trade logs. I noticed that the page <a href="http://theoptionguru.com/" rel="nofollow">http://theoptionguru.com/</a> has no Index value in Google, But <a href="http://theoptionguru.com/blog" rel="nofollow">http://theoptionguru.com/blog</a> has PR 2. Why not you modify your <a href="http://theoptionguru.com/" rel="nofollow">http://theoptionguru.com/</a> to point to <a href="http://theoptionguru.com/blogs/" rel="nofollow">http://theoptionguru.com/blogs/</a> and <a href="http://theoptionguru.com/archives" rel="nofollow">http://theoptionguru.com/archives</a> (or something like that) point to <a href="http://buywrite.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://buywrite.wordpress.com</a> ?<br />
This will be good for google to index and earn good PR in the long run.<br />
Just my two cents &#8230;<br />
By the the way I am writing with the same name &#8220;optionguru&#8221; in my Indian Options Blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://theoptionguru.com/blog/2010/01/this-is-so-difficult/comment-page-1/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoptionguru.com/blog/?p=1340#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Paul,

You&#039;re right, I am not always 100% in every month. For instance, right now I am only 75% in. I also don&#039;t expect every month to be profitable, so I have set a conservative target of 20-25% with reality in mind.

Why not Buy-Writes? That&#039;s the way I used to do it, with a buy-write (the name of my former blog). Over time, the many people that contribute to the JustCoveredCalls Yahoo group have convinced me that there is another way that is a bit less risky. Selling a Naked Put (a Covered Call is sometimes called a synthetic Naked Put) allows me more flexibility on how I enter the stock. If I was doing a Buy-Write, I would be looking for a stock that is at the top of its current trading range - that enable me to maximize my Call premium while minimizing the possibility of expiring ITM.

With a Naked Put, I am looking to buy at the bottom of its current trading range in order to minimize the option expiring ITM while looking to sell a strike that would put my cost basis below a recent low. Even though I would be happy to own any of the stocks I am trading in my Conservative Account, the ideal scenario is to have the stock turn bullish after I sell the Put and then just keep the premium without ever owning the stock. Ultimately, it comes down do a question of style and what you are comfortable with.

If the stock turns bullish and I have a Naked Put, I have a bit more flexibility on what I can do to recover and I don&#039;t have to worry about the stock. Again, just a matter of what you are comfortable with. So if you&#039;re not sure what it is, then keep doing what you are doing. BUT, if you have the time and a paper account, give the Naked Put strategy a try. For instance, my NYX trade is working according to the book. I entered on 11/25 with a JAN 25 strike and a cost basis (if Put the stock) of 23.88 which was well below the recent low on 11/3 of 25.01. Then on 1/11 I rolled it to FEB 26 for an additional 0.80 credit and a new Cost Basis of 24.08 which is right at the last low on 12/08 of 23.98. I am not going to worry about this trade until the second week of February - kind of a nice since there are plenty of other things to worry about. Right?

&lt;em&gt;- Jeff&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, I am not always 100% in every month. For instance, right now I am only 75% in. I also don&#8217;t expect every month to be profitable, so I have set a conservative target of 20-25% with reality in mind.</p>
<p>Why not Buy-Writes? That&#8217;s the way I used to do it, with a buy-write (the name of my former blog). Over time, the many people that contribute to the JustCoveredCalls Yahoo group have convinced me that there is another way that is a bit less risky. Selling a Naked Put (a Covered Call is sometimes called a synthetic Naked Put) allows me more flexibility on how I enter the stock. If I was doing a Buy-Write, I would be looking for a stock that is at the top of its current trading range &#8211; that enable me to maximize my Call premium while minimizing the possibility of expiring ITM.</p>
<p>With a Naked Put, I am looking to buy at the bottom of its current trading range in order to minimize the option expiring ITM while looking to sell a strike that would put my cost basis below a recent low. Even though I would be happy to own any of the stocks I am trading in my Conservative Account, the ideal scenario is to have the stock turn bullish after I sell the Put and then just keep the premium without ever owning the stock. Ultimately, it comes down do a question of style and what you are comfortable with.</p>
<p>If the stock turns bullish and I have a Naked Put, I have a bit more flexibility on what I can do to recover and I don&#8217;t have to worry about the stock. Again, just a matter of what you are comfortable with. So if you&#8217;re not sure what it is, then keep doing what you are doing. BUT, if you have the time and a paper account, give the Naked Put strategy a try. For instance, my NYX trade is working according to the book. I entered on 11/25 with a JAN 25 strike and a cost basis (if Put the stock) of 23.88 which was well below the recent low on 11/3 of 25.01. Then on 1/11 I rolled it to FEB 26 for an additional 0.80 credit and a new Cost Basis of 24.08 which is right at the last low on 12/08 of 23.98. I am not going to worry about this trade until the second week of February &#8211; kind of a nice since there are plenty of other things to worry about. Right?</p>
<p><em>- Jeff</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://theoptionguru.com/blog/2010/01/this-is-so-difficult/comment-page-1/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoptionguru.com/blog/?p=1340#comment-715</guid>
		<description>Jeff

If you average 20 -25% annually on 3 to 4% month returns could I assume you are not in the market half the time ... as 3 to 4 would translate to 36 to 48 .... or am I missing something (more likely).

Could you explain why you do a naked put in place of just buying the stock and writing a covered call?   For some reason a feel a lot more secure doing a buy write .... not sure what it is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff</p>
<p>If you average 20 -25% annually on 3 to 4% month returns could I assume you are not in the market half the time &#8230; as 3 to 4 would translate to 36 to 48 &#8230;. or am I missing something (more likely).</p>
<p>Could you explain why you do a naked put in place of just buying the stock and writing a covered call?   For some reason a feel a lot more secure doing a buy write &#8230;. not sure what it is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

